|
Search
Monthly Archives
July 2009
June 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004
Category Archives
|
2009:07:04:08:00. Saturday. NO!: ARCHIE POWELL & THE EXPORTS (#489, JUN 24 2009).
This is the lead track off the Exports' debut EP, which is available for free download at Bandcamp (and since I'll probably not get the chance to feature them before the podcast ends, you can get Direct Hit! there as well). The band had a set at this year's Summerfest and should be putting together a full-length album pretty soon, to go with upcoming shows around the midwest.
2009:07:03:08:00. Friday. NO!: ARCHIE POWELL & THE EXPORTS (#488, JUN 24 2009).
This is another late-model Box Social holdover, and it's one where you can really hear the difference between the two bands. Last time I heard this song it was a lot more raucous and careening (also it was in Madison's loudest venue), now it's got a distinct, new tone. In fact, if you take this band and the other post-Box Social band (the Nick Woods-fronted Direct Hit!) and combine them, you'll get something that sounds a lot like the Box Social. Which sort of seems obvious, but trying combining Angels and Airwaves with (+44) and see if you get Blink-182.
2009:07:02:08:00. Thursday. NO!: ARCHIE POWELL & THE EXPORTS (#487, JUN 24 2009).
I believe this is the first instance of someone's new band being in the podcast, when that someone's previous band had also been featured. Indeed, I even recorded this song as performed by the Box Social (well, two of the Box Social in an acoustic set) last fall. So hey, milestone! This is actually a pretty old Box Social song -- it was originally on their 2004 EP, then they started revamping it as they prepped new material last year. Much of that new stuff has transitioned into the Exports' set, in slightly modified form as keyboards have replaced the second guitar in the previous arrangements.
2009:06:28:08:00. Sunday. NO!: PALE YOUNG GENTLEMEN (#486, JUN 14 2009).
Even though, to be frank, we never went to a lot of Madison's many summer festivals, I was always really glad that they were there and will miss them when we move. They're great outlets for local music and give bands a chance to get in front of different audiences than they see in clubs. If anything I think this one might be growing -- it's the first time I've seen such a big-time stage setup for the Marquette Waterfront Festival.
2009:06:26:08:00. Friday. NO!: PALE YOUNG GENTLEMEN (#485, JUN 14 2009).
This one provides a nice opening to the PYGs most recent album, and apparently it's also great to dance and spin around to. A section of newer stuff came up in the set starting with this song, but overall the set seemed to be mostly first-album stuff that maybe works a little better live.
2009:06:25:08:00. Thursday. NO!: PALE YOUNG GENTLEMEN (#484, JUN 14 2009).
OK, Pale Young Gentlemen, I give up. My iPod has your two albums and your cover of "Paper Planes." If you have some stock of secret other songs that includes this one, I don't know about it. I do like this one, though.
2009:06:23:08:00. Tuesday. NO!: PALE YOUNG GENTLEMEN (#483, JUN 14 2009).
Experiment time! Since the Marquette Waterfront Festival is an outdoor event, I decided to try out shooting a clip with my Nikon D90, knowing the dissipated sound wouldn't overwhelm its little mic. The potential advantages to this: 1) it shoots in HD, though I realized later that I hadn't actually set it to HD, and 2) I get the visual benefits of shooting through a nice SLR lens, with all the options that implies. But the disadvantages were many: 1) it's a lot heavier than my camcorder, 2) autofocus doesn't work for video, which limits my ability to alter the zoom angle very much, 3) can't really fiddle with any of the other options while shooting, either, 4) no image stabilization. But that said, I really like how the picture came out -- the detail's good enough to get a sense of how many little gnats were swarming around the lakeside -- and I think if I'd brought a tripod and thought about how I wanted to shoot in advance the weaknesses could've been overcome.
2009:06:21:12:37. Sunday. ADVERTISING IS MAGIC. Once I get settled into my job I'll be blogging about mass comm and new media topics more frequently, but I saw something the other day that prompted me to get ahead of myself a little. Ezra Klein had this note about the RSS feeds at his new Washington Post blog: As you know, [the previously posted internal feed] works fine. But now the main feed is working too. The difference is pretty simple: About once every 20 or 30 posts, the main feed includes one post with an advertisement. Annoying, right? But it also helps make this blog viable. More to the point, it helps convince the Washington Post that full text RSS feeds -- which they've kindly allowed me to retain -- are viable. So though no one likes advertisements, making full-text feed more viable as a matter of revenue means they'll be more common at revenue-dependent institutions.
I don't mean to pick on Ezra at all here, since this is a notion you see frequently and his post was just the thing that made me remember I wanted to write about it. But isn't this expression of the open secret that online advertising is just noise interesting? This is one of the long-term issues with ad-supported online media that no one's really thinking about much in corporate accounting offices: People tune ads out. There's this idea among advertisers and media orgs that simply showing people ads -- for example, getting them to use the ad-interspersed RSS feeds -- is worthwhile. But even apart from tools like AdBlock Plus, people have been conditioned to use internal ad blocks. What happens when, at some point in the future, advertisers begin to realize that their magic isn't working?
2009:06:19:08:00. Friday. NO!: LOCKSLEY (#482, JUN 13 2009).
Thanks again to my tipster, I've got the name of this one and now know that yesterday's song is, in fact, called "21st Century." Just in time to correct them for YouTube! As I noted previously, I was kind of surprised by the low-ish turnout for this show. The balcony was closed off, which I've never seen at the Majestic before, and I assume it's because they didn't need the room -- a few people wound up sitting up there during the Locksley set, but no more than half a dozen. But meanwhile, those people who were down on the floor went crazy pretty much the whole time. And for almost exclusively new material! I'm actually really excited for the new album (due this fall, supposedly), as there have been a number of follow-up albums lately that haven't really done much for me.
|
IN THE NEWS
The Daily Page
Google News madison.com The Onion Pitchfork Punknews.org Stylus Magazine Tiny Mix Tapes
ALSO!
Aaron S. Veenstra: Academic
Cherche la Fave... del.icio.us Emily Kircher Recycling Artist last.fm YouTube
UPCOMING EVENTS
|